AgentMingo

Use case

AI code review comments, back in the coding agent's thread

Your AI code reviewer leaves comments on the pull request. CI fails a test. The coding agent that wrote the change is still open in a terminal with all the context, and doesn't know. AgentMingo closes that gap: results on the pull request go to the thread working on its branch, sorted, as one note per push.

Sign up freeWhen the loop stops

Free during the open beta. Works with Claude Code today; Codex and more are next. On macOS or Linux.

What's sent, and where it comes from

Stop being the copy-paste between your reviewer, CI and your agent

Comments from your AI code reviewer and CI's failures go to the thread working on that branch, already sorted. It fixes what's its own and leaves main's failures alone.

Example
  1. Your AI code reviewer and CI report on the pull request
  2. AgentMingo sorts each one: must fix, a suggestion, not yours (main fails it too), likely flaky, a ticket for later, or noise
  3. The thread on that branch gets them, and is woken if it's idle (up to 8 hours after its last reply, longer while its work is open)
  4. It fixes its own, leaves main's failure alone, and pushes
  5. The checks run again; what passes, or is resolved on GitHub, leaves the list
Illustration with made-up names. Needs the GitHub App on the repository, and review results on for the computer.
  • Inline comments from review bots. These are read in their own format, with the level each one gives: CodeRabbit, Copilot code review, Greptile, Cursor Bugbot, Gemini Code Assist, Qodo and Sourcery. Inline comments from any other bot are passed on as plain text. A reviewer's summary comment isn't passed on.
  • CI failures from check runs, from GitHub Actions or any CI that reports them. A commit status alone isn't passed on as a failure.
  • Comments from people who can write to the repository: line comments, replies, reviews and conversation comments. Never a stranger's, and never on a pull request from a fork.
  • Merge conflicts, as something to fix.

Sorted before the thread sees it

  • Must fix: a failing check, a review bot's Critical or Major comment, a merge conflict, or a reviewer's requested changes or comments. These hold the pull request.
  • Suggestions: review bots' Minor comments. They go to the thread with a round, but never hold the pull request or use a round.
  • Not yours: a check that fails on main too. The thread is told to leave it alone, with its next message, and it never uses a round.
  • Likely flaky: a check that has failed and then passed on the same commit more than once lately. The thread is told to re-run it before changing code.

Rounds, and when the loop stops

  • A round is one note to the thread with what CI and the review bots found after its push. Only must-fix items use one; up to 3 rounds go by themselves, then they wait for you.
  • A round waits for CI and the review bots to finish on the latest commit, so one push's results arrive as one note.
  • An idle thread is woken for a round, up to 8 hours after its last reply and longer while its work is open. Otherwise the results go with its next message.
  • Each repository sets its own number of automatic rounds, from none up to 10. When they're used up and the thread is still live, a member can give the pull request 1 or 3 more rounds from its page, or say continue, or merge anyway.
  • A review bot's comment that's already fixed can be closed on the page as Already fixed or Not needed. When CodeRabbit pauses its reviews, you can ask it for a new one from there.
  • One status on every pull request. Fixing: the thread has the must-fix items. It's working on them, or CI and the review bots are checking its push. Blocked: must-fix items are open and haven't gone to the thread yet. They go together once CI and the review bots finish on the latest commit. Needs you: the thread stopped with must-fix items open. Give it more rounds or say continue, close one that's already fixed or not needed, or merge anyway. Ready to merge: CI passed and nothing must-fix is open. Suggestions don't hold it, and nothing merges by itself.
  • Nothing merges by itself: you do, on GitHub or from AgentMingo as yourself.

Other ways to close the loop

  • Copy-paste works, until there are five threads and three reviewers.
  • Claude Code Desktop shows a pull request's checks and, with Auto-fix on, fixes failing checks and, in its local sessions, addresses new review comments[1]. AgentMingo does this for threads in the terminal, VS Code and Cursor as well, and your team sees every pull request's status in one place.
  • CodeRabbit's Claude Code integration runs the CodeRabbit CLI on your computer so Claude Code can ask for a review and fix what it finds[2]. AgentMingo works from the pull request: the comments your reviewer leaves there, and CI's results.

What it needs

  • The AgentMingo GitHub App on the repository.
  • Review results on for the computer: one of the setup command's boxes, on by default (reviews off turns it off).
  • A review bot's inline comments or CI check runs on the pull request.

Not working? See Troubleshooting. We count results sent back and how long each took to resolve; we don't claim it saves time (How we measure).

Sources

Checked November 3, 2026, on each product's own pages. Products change: the links say what they say today.

  1. Claude Code: Claude Code Desktop shows a pull request's checks and, with Auto-fix on, fixes failing checks and, in a local session, addresses new review comments. code.claude.com
  2. CodeRabbit: CodeRabbit's Claude Code integration runs the CodeRabbit CLI on your computer, so Claude Code can ask for a review and fix what it finds. docs.coderabbit.ai

Jira, Linear, GitHub, Shortcut and other product names on this site are trademarks of their owners. AgentMingo isn't affiliated with or endorsed by them.

Questions

Does it work with CodeRabbit?

Yes. CodeRabbit is one of the reviewers read in its own format, along with Copilot code review, Greptile, Cursor Bugbot, Gemini Code Assist, Qodo and Sourcery. When CodeRabbit pauses its reviews, the page lets you ask it for a new one.

Will the agent push or merge on its own?

Review text is passed on as findings to check, never as instructions, and pushing follows your project's own rules. Nothing merges by itself: you do.

Does it add tokens?

Yes. The note itself is short, but a round that wakes an idle thread starts a turn of Claude Code on your own account. That turn re-reads the conversation, so it uses tokens, more the longer the conversation, and the fixes use tokens like any other work. Each repository caps its automatic rounds, and the thread's page shows its tokens.

Do I need GitHub?

Yes, for this. Review results, merge conflicts and main changes need the GitHub App; GitLab and Bitbucket aren't supported for them.

Send your reviewer's comments to the thread that can fix them.

Sign up, run one command on your computer, and keep working. Free during the open beta.

Sign up free