AgentMingo

Use cases

Project management for coding agents

When a coding agent writes the code, the work happens in a thread on someone's computer, not on the board. AgentMingo keeps the two connected: the task goes into the thread, and the thread's progress comes back to the task.

Sign up freeFollow one ticket to merge

Free during the open beta. Works with Claude Code today; Codex and more are next. On macOS or Linux.

What changes when agents do the typing

A tracker built for people assumes whoever picks up the ticket reads it, asks about it and moves the card. With a coding agent in the loop, three things slip. The ticket has to be pasted into the thread, and pasted again when it changes. Review comments and CI failures land on the pull request, where the thread can't see them. And the board is right only if someone remembers to update it while several threads run at once.

Project management for coding agents is mostly about closing those three gaps, without asking the agent to do the bookkeeping.

Six things that keep tasks and threads in step

  • A task written for the agent to read

    Each task has a description and a list of acceptance criteria. A thread that starts on the task's branch gets both with its first message, framed as the work and never as orders that outrank you.
    Ticket to pull request

  • One key that ties it together

    Put the task's key in the branch name, such as web-12-saved-carts or ana/WEB-12. Threads on that branch, and pull requests from it, are tied to WEB-12. Follow a Jira project, and its issues' keys work the same way.
    Claude Code and Jira

  • Statuses that follow the work

    The task moves to In progress when its first thread reports, to In review when a pull request opens (not a draft), and to Done when the last of its pull requests merges. Threads and pull requests never move it backwards. Work that isn't a code change is finished by marking it done.
    Claude Code task board

  • A process the thread follows

    A workflow hands the thread one step at a time: plan, a person approves the plan, build, test, open the pull request. Approve on the thread's page or the task's page, from your phone if that's where you are.
    Follow the steps

  • Review results that reach the right thread

    Comments from your AI code reviewer and CI's failures on the pull request go to the thread working on its branch, sorted into must fix and suggestions. Failures that main has too are marked as not this change's.
    AI code review loop

  • What every thread and task used

    Each thread reports its tokens, priced at API list prices, and a task adds up the threads tied to it. Counted from the threads' own reports, never estimated.
    Team dashboard

What reaches a thread, in one picture

Where the notes come from, how AgentMingo finds the thread on that branch, and how a thread waiting on you comes back to you.

How notes reach a thread: your tickets, your AI code reviewers and CI, teammates' threads, the main branch and your workflow go to AgentMingo. It sorts what came in, finds the thread working on that branch and hands it one short note. Review and CI results and a workflow's next step can wake it if it's idle (up to 8 hours after its last reply, longer while its work is open); the rest go with its next message. When a thread waits on a prompt or a question, AgentMingo tells you by a bell, a push notice or chat, and, while its computer is on, your answer goes back to it.

By job to be done

Keep your tracker, or use ours

AgentMingo's tasks are small on purpose: a board, a list, sprints, dependencies, labels, estimates and workflows. If your team lives in Jira, follow your Jira projects instead. Their issues become tasks here, kept in sync, and threads get them the same way. Linear and GitHub Issues aren't read; a task can be exported to either, one way.

Compare trackers Claude Code and Jira

Coming soon

AgentMingo's own agents will take a task, plan it, build it, review and test it on AgentMingo's servers, and bring you a pull request to approve. They aren't available yet. Everything else on this page works today, with your own coding agent's threads.

Questions

Is this a replacement for Jira?

It can be, for a small team whose work happens in coding agent threads: AgentMingo's tasks cover a board, a list, sprints and dependencies. Larger teams usually keep Jira and connect it, so threads get Jira issues as their brief. The comparison pages set out both.

Trackers for coding agents, compared

Which coding agents does it work with?

Works with Claude Code today; Codex and more are next. Claude Code in the terminal, VS Code, Cursor or the desktop app, on macOS or Linux.

Do I have to use tasks?

No. Threads show up live, review results reach them and teammates' overlapping files are flagged with or without a task. Tasks add the brief at a thread's start, statuses that move by themselves, and cost per task.

What does it cost?

Free during the open beta. After it, Free stays free for up to 2 members per organization, and Team is $5 per month for each additional member, with notice before anything is charged. Your AI provider and coding agent bill you directly, as now.

Pricing

Give your tasks and your coding agent threads one place.

Sign up, run one command on your computer, and keep working. Free during the open beta.

Sign up free